|Assalamu'alaikum, Mathonius. Kru seumangat, ka trôk neulangkah bak Wikipèdia bahsa Acèh!|
Seulamat neuteumuléh! Kamoe mandum meuprèh teunuléh-teunuléh droeneuh bak Wikipèdia bahsa Acèh nyoe!
Demi Lovato[peusaneut nè]
Hi Mathonius. I just wanna give you a direction. Regarding the picture at Demi Lovato article, you might want to see this policy Wikipedia:Neuatô bhaih gamba leumah awrat lam Wikipèdia (in Acehnese) or the previous draft (in English). The picture policy is kinda special here, and it is the result of a negotiation headed by User:WhisperToMe and User:Bennylin with the Acehnese Wikipedia community. Rgds, Naval Scene (bicara) 8 Buleuën Lapan 2012 06.28 (UTC)
- Thanks, Naval Scene. That's an interesting policy. I'm glad there's an English version available. ;) I'll keep it in mind from now on. Mathonius (bicara) 8 Buleuën Lapan 2012 07.37 (UTC)
Administrator access[peusaneut nè]
Article Geurija Isa Jatoë[peusaneut nè]
- Hello Si Gam, thanks for your message. I think there are at least three different issues here and they're all related: 1) the quality of the article, 2) the conflict with Jose77, and 3) the action of Vogone. The article Geurija Isa Jatoë is disputed by you and you've deleted it multiple times. Jose77 disagrees with you and they restored it multiple times. After your adminship ended, they re-created the article and an editwar between Jose77 and you followed. I also see that Vogone intervened and protected the article against further changes, thereby ending the editwar.
- From my point of view, it doesn't make much sense to engage in an editwar, because that approach won't improve the quality of the article (nor the quality of the encyclopedia as a whole) and it certainly won't resolve the conflict with Jose77. I think you shouldn't let them provoke you this way. Always stay calm and try to look for constructive and reasonable solutions. As an administrator on a sister project of the Aceh Wikipedia, I always ask myself this question before deleting something: would this encyclopedia really be better off without any article about this topic? The True Jesus Church is evidently notable enough to be described on Wikipedia, so I don't believe nothing (no information) would be better than something (some information).
- You're not obligated to correct every mistake in the article, but you could easily write a correct stub about this topic, so you could improve the encyclopedia and inform the readers. That's what we're here for, right? Writing a short article with correct information would solve two of the issues: the quality of the article would be improved and the conflict with Jose77 might be resolved as well. The third issue, the action of Vogone, is already resolved, because the page protection only lasted for 24 hours.