Wikipedia:Comment request/Solution for the controversy about main page

Nibak Wikipedia
Loncat ke navigasi Loncat ke pencarian

Try to solve this case through a voting / comment request with options:

  1. "Keeping the template as it's latest form"
  2. "Modifying it to link to the voting about removing images"
  3. "Removing the template and moving the case about Muhammad"

--Juhko (talk | contribs)

Note: I have removed the option "Removing the template" (and doing nothing with this case), because it doesn't help, sorry.

1 - "Keeping the template as it's latest form"[Peusaneut nè]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Akô keeping the template on main page. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 17:29, 18 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Akô keeping the template on main page. --Fadli Idris 21:25, 18 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Akô keeping the template on main page. --hack87 07:02, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Akô keeping the template on main page. Abi Azkia 06:36, 20 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Akô keeping the template on main page. -- Si Gam Acèh (peugah habay | peuneugöt) 19:12, 24 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Talk[Peusaneut nè]

May i ask why another poll was opened? There already is a poll going on here, which apparently covers the same subject. Since this Wiki is relatively small so i see no reason why there should be two polls. If anything both could be merged together. Excirial 10:27, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

There are two cases, main page template and Muhammmad images on other Wikipedias. Note this is no (anymore) a poll but it's a comment request in different form than the one on Meta. This comment request is about the template and what should be done with it. Myself i don't see any reason for the another poll because it's restricted to Acehnese Wikipedians and eventually doesn't lead to any solution. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 10:31, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
Is the goal of the first poll to forbid the usage of images of Muhammad on other Wikipedia's? (Sorry if i misunderstood that, Google's translation of the text is flawed at best) If that is the case i will have to disappoint you - consensus formed on this Wiki is not applicable to other wiki's any more then consensus on other wiki's is applicable to this one. Excirial 12:38, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
For the another English comment on that page I understood that the same way. I made the comment request about the images on Meta: [1] The mission is just to calm down Acehnese wikipedians. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 12:40, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

2 - "Modifying it to link to the voting about removing images"[Peusaneut nè]

Talk[Peusaneut nè]

3 - "Removing the template and moving the case about Muhammad"[Peusaneut nè]

  1. I think you talk about this version. Wikipedia is absolutly not the place to make proselitism. Defining a local policy about images acceptable or not here is something that can be done since it's not in contradiction with founding principles. Using Wikipedia to request users to adopt your point of view is simply forbidden --Hercule 10:45, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

Talk[Peusaneut nè]

This new option. Want to have comment do Acehnese Wikipedians accept this. Myself I still support keeping the template as it's latest form. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 10:06, 19 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)

I suggest to take some advice from Kylu. The suggestions on his user page make sense. TheDJ 20:35, 20 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
Agree. --Juhko (talk | contribs) 22:08, 20 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)
Even for those who don't want to take part in the RFC and want to continue to protest, and want the template on the main page, they are free to use. I think the userbox one might be acceptable in projects where the other template might be deleted or cause the user to be banned. Kylu 00:13, 26 Buleuën Tujôh 2010 (UTC)